Good evening.  Nearly 10 years ago, America suffered the worst attack on our shores since Pearl Harbor.  This mass murder was planned by Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda network in Afghanistan, and signaled a new threat to our security –- one in which the targets were no longer soldiers on a battlefield, but innocent men, women and children going about their daily lives. 

Targets of war, or attack, have never been limited in times of conflict to only those apparently-guilty soldiers on a battlefield.  This was not a new threat to American security, but was a fantastically-successful terrorist attack, the impetus for which had been building ever since the first Gulf War.  America made itself less secure by force projection and military immersion in Southwest Asia in the nineties.   Had it kept its nose out of Southwest Asia, 9-11 would not have happened.  Even so, 9-11, as successful as it was so far as terrorist attacks go, did nothing to impair long-term security.  Al Qaeda’s attack on America was like a flea biting a lion.

In the days that followed, our nation was united as we struck at al Qaeda and routed the Taliban in Afghanistan.  Then, our focus shifted.  A second war was launched in Iraq, and we spent enormous blood and treasure to support a new government there.  By the time I took office, the war in Afghanistan had entered its seventh year.  But al Qaeda’s leaders had escaped into Pakistan and were plotting new attacks, while the Taliban had regrouped and gone on the offensive.  Without a new strategy and decisive action, our military commanders warned that we could face a resurgent al Qaeda and a Taliban taking over large parts of Afghanistan.

For this reason, in one of the most difficult decisions that I’ve made as President, I ordered an additional 30,000 American troops into Afghanistan.  When I announced this surge at West Point, we set clear objectives:  to refocus on al Qaeda, to reverse the Taliban’s momentum, and train Afghan security forces to defend their own country.  I also made it clear that our commitment would not be open-ended, and that we would begin to draw down our forces this July.

The military academies always make a nice backdrop for speeches that initiate or extend military interventions.  Within a few months of engagement in Afghanistan, America had done all that was possible to avenge the attacks of 9-11, deposing the Taliban regime and chasing Al Qaeda into the hills of eastern Pakistan.  America stayed in Afghanistan, and moved on to Iraq, out of imperial compulsion.

Tonight, I can tell you that we are fulfilling that commitment.  Thanks to our extraordinary men and women in uniform, our civilian personnel, and our many coalition partners, we are meeting our goals.  As a result, starting next month, we will be able to remove 10,000 of our troops from Afghanistan by the end of this year, and we will bring home a total of 33,000 troops by next summer, fully recovering the surge I announced at West Point.  After this initial reduction, our troops will continue coming home at a steady pace as Afghan security forces move into the lead.  Our mission will change from combat to support.  By 2014, this process of transition will be complete, and the Afghan people will be responsible for their own security. 

Existential conflict has no time-line.  This was no existential fight, but morphed quickly from avenging a brazen attack into expanding the American Empire.  America will never leave Afghanistan until it is forced to do so.  Decreasing troop strength a bit hardly equates to leaving Afghanistan; promising to be clear of the country by 2014, i.e., in five years from now, is as hollow a promise as could possibly be imagined.  No one will remember what was said in 2011 when by 2014 the American Empire has been “forced” by rogue elements in Pakistan, and its nuclear weaponry, to subdue and occupy it, using Afghanistan, of course, as a base of operations.

We’re starting this drawdown from a position of strength.  Al Qaeda is under more pressure than at any time since 9/11.  Together with the Pakistanis, we have taken out more than half of al Qaeda’s leadership.  And thanks to our intelligence professionals and Special Forces, we killed Osama bin Laden, the only leader that al Qaeda had ever known.  This was a victory for all who have served since 9/11.  One soldier summed it up well.  “The message,” he said, “is we don’t forget.  You will be held accountable, no matter how long it takes.” 

Al Qaeda is a straw man.  Al Qaeda no more represents a threat to the continuation of American existence, either now or at 9-11, than the flea that bit the lion, except that the flea apparently carried the virulent disease of imperialism with which America is now afflicted.  Obama can claim friendship and alliance with the Pakistanis in a speech to Americans because Americans aren’t much paying attention.  Pakistan is up next on the imperialism agenda, even if Obama refuses to believe it himself. 

The information that we recovered from bin Laden’s compound shows al Qaeda under enormous strain.  Bin Laden expressed concern that al Qaeda had been unable to effectively replace senior terrorists that had been killed, and that al Qaeda has failed in its effort to portray America as a nation at war with Islam -– thereby draining more widespread support.  Al Qaeda remains dangerous, and we must be vigilant against attacks.  But we have put al Qaeda on a path to defeat, and we will not relent until the job is done.

Being “vigilant against attacks” equates to America doing what it damn well pleases internationally and abroad so far as the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of innocent men, women and children goes.  Civil liberties and fundamental human rights are no match for American vigilance.   Al Qaeda is conveniently, indispensably, incapable of suffering defeat, as it is more an idea and methodology than an organization.  This will allow America to retain its policy of international barbarism indefinitely.

In Afghanistan, we’ve inflicted serious losses on the Taliban and taken a number of its strongholds.  Along with our surge, our allies also increased their commitments, which helped stabilize more of the country.  Afghan security forces have grown by over 100,000 troops, and in some provinces and municipalities we’ve already begun to transition responsibility for security to the Afghan people.  In the face of violence and intimidation, Afghans are fighting and dying for their country, establishing local police forces, opening markets and schools, creating new opportunities for women and girls, and trying to turn the page on decades of war.

As barbaric are America’s methods, it nonetheless vaingloriously covets the approval of the peoples it wishes to subdue and subjugate.  Americans instinctively assume that all peoples everywhere wish to structure their society’s like its own, including awarding exalted victimhood to half or more of their populations (i.e., the female half that needs new opportunities, whether they want them or not).

Of course, huge challenges remain.  This is the beginning — but not the end –- of our effort to wind down this war.  We’ll have to do the hard work of keeping the gains that we’ve made, while we draw down our forces and transition responsibility for security to the Afghan government.  And next May, in Chicago, we will host a summit with our NATO allies and partners to shape the next phase of this transition.

But is this the end of the beginning?  How could winding down this war be difficult?  America started the war, which really isn’t a war, but is a military occupation.  It can end the occupation any time it likes.  Who is to stop America from leaving, except itself?  Does that mean that America is the victim of its own fecklessness? Hosting summits of a more or less defunct military alliance ought to set things right.

We do know that peace cannot come to a land that has known so much war without a political settlement.  So as we strengthen the Afghan government and security forces, America will join initiatives that reconcile the Afghan people, including the Taliban.  Our position on these talks is clear:  They must be led by the Afghan government, and those who want to be a part of a peaceful Afghanistan must break from al Qaeda, abandon violence, and abide by the Afghan constitution.  But, in part because of our military effort, we have reason to believe that progress can be made.

America believes all those Predator drone strikes to have shown it to be the only organization worthy of exercising a monopoly on violence; if everyone else acknowledges as much, America will transfer its violence monopoly to the Afghan government, such as it is, until it proves again its deficit nature. 

The goal that we seek is achievable, and can be expressed simply:  No safe haven from which al Qaeda or its affiliates can launch attacks against our homeland or our allies.  We won’t try to make Afghanistan a perfect place.  We will not police its streets or patrol its mountains indefinitely.  That is the responsibility of the Afghan government, which must step up its ability to protect its people, and move from an economy shaped by war to one that can sustain a lasting peace.  What we can do, and will do, is build a partnership with the Afghan people that endures –- one that ensures that we will be able to continue targeting terrorists and supporting a sovereign Afghan government.

The goal of preventing Al Qaeda attacks on America or its allies (does it automatically make one an ally if Al Qaeda attacks them?) is categorically unachievable.  Proclaiming such a goal is tantamount to thinking that one could prevent murder by declaring it illegal.  Guess who is the majority partner in any partnership forged with Afghanistan?  Calling an occupation a partnership makes it no less an occupation. 

Of course, our efforts must also address terrorist safe havens in Pakistan.  No country is more endangered by the presence of violent extremists, which is why we will continue to press Pakistan to expand its participation in securing a more peaceful future for this war-torn region.  We’ll work with the Pakistani government to root out the cancer of violent extremism, and we will insist that it keeps its commitments.  For there should be no doubt that so long as I am President, the United States will never tolerate a safe haven for those who aim to kill us.  They cannot elude us, nor escape the justice they deserve. 

There is no way to know whom might be aiming to kill Americans, so this effectively makes Obama assassinator-in-chief.  The US is nothing more or less than a protection racket.  There will  be no safe havens because nowhere and no one will escape scrutiny.

My fellow Americans, this has been a difficult decade for our country.  We’ve learned anew the profound cost of war — a cost that’s been paid by the nearly 4,500 Americans who have given their lives in Iraq, and the over 1,500 who have done so in Afghanistan -– men and women who will not live to enjoy the freedom that they defended.  Thousands more have been wounded. Some have lost limbs on the battlefield, and others still battle the demons that have followed them home.

There is never anything profound to follow when a paragraph starts with “My fellow Americans”.  The difficult decade that is described is totally and completely America’s own fault.  America decided, using as justification a brazen terrorist attack, to expand the Empire into Afghanistan and Iraq (and now Yemen, Libya, Somalia, et al).  Outside of corn and wheat, our only export is security enhancement to benefit the Empire.

Yet tonight, we take comfort in knowing that the tide of war is receding.  Fewer of our sons and daughters are serving in harm’s way.  We’ve ended our combat mission in Iraq, with 100,000 American troops already out of that country.  And even as there will be dark days ahead in Afghanistan, the light of a secure peace can be seen in the distance.  These long wars will come to a responsible end.

At least Obama can claim for his base that he’s trying to bring these wars to an end as the “tide of war” recedes.  America is to the tide of these wars as the moon is to oceanic tides.  It caused their advance, and it can cause their retreat.  But this promise to bring the wars to a responsible end is so much nonsense.  First, these aren’t wars, but are military occupations; second, these wars will all end just as they are now, in permanent occupation and administration. 

As they do, we must learn their lessons.  Already this decade of war has caused many to question the nature of America’s engagement around the world.  Some would have America retreat from our responsibility as an anchor of global security, and embrace an isolation that ignores the very real threats that we face.  Others would have America over-extended, confronting every evil that can be found abroad.

America is the anchor of global security, but isn’t an empire?  Only a trained sophist could arrive at such a distinction.    “Evil” is anything standing in the way of the American Empire.  It will be confronted so far as the Empire is capable of confronting it.  Non-profitable corners of the globe, and expansions that are too costly to undertake, will be ignored, evil or not.

We must chart a more centered course.  Like generations before, we must embrace America’s singular role in the course of human events.  But we must be as pragmatic as we are passionate; as strategic as we are resolute.  When threatened, we must respond with force –- but when that force can be targeted, we need not deploy large armies overseas.  When innocents are being slaughtered and global security endangered, we don’t have to choose between standing idly by or acting on our own.  Instead, we must rally international action, which we’re doing in Libya, where we do not have a single soldier on the ground, but are supporting allies in protecting the Libyan people and giving them the chance to determine their own destiny.

The Libyan people were well on their way to determining their own destiny until American military power, camouflaged by its feckless leadership submitting it to NATO command control, intervened.  Exactly which innocents were being slaughtered in Libya is not clear, but it is clear that Qaddafi must go, so America will assassinate him too, if necessary.

In all that we do, we must remember that what sets America apart is not solely our power -– it is the principles upon which our union was founded.  We’re a nation that brings our enemies to justice while adhering to the rule of law, and respecting the rights of all our citizens.  We protect our own freedom and prosperity by extending it to others.  We stand not for empire, but for self-determination.  That is why we have a stake in the democratic aspirations that are now washing across the Arab world.  We will support those revolutions with fidelity to our ideals, with the power of our example, and with an unwavering belief that all human beings deserve to live with freedom and dignity.

“Enemies” like Bin Laden, who was “brought to justice” to face those charges pending against him in New York, it is supposed.  America is exceptional only in the imperial sales job it pitches.  It disguises its Empire building by claiming to stand for self-determination, as long as the self that gets to determine is the one  America wishes to do so, otherwise, the determined self is deemed an oppressor standing against all humanity.  Except when America needs some resource buried in their sand, then self-determination, particularly in the Kingdom of Saud, is verboten.

Above all, we are a nation whose strength abroad has been anchored in opportunity for our citizens here at home.  Over the last decade, we have spent a trillion dollars on war, at a time of rising debt and hard economic times.  Now, we must invest in America’s greatest resource –- our people.  We must unleash innovation that creates new jobs and industries, while living within our means.  We must rebuild our infrastructure and find new and clean sources of energy.  And most of all, after a decade of passionate debate, we must recapture the common purpose that we shared at the beginning of this time of war.  For our nation draws strength from our differences, and when our union is strong no hill is too steep, no horizon is beyond our reach.

America, it is time to focus on nation building here at home.

There is no way to makes sense of the idea that the nation draws its strength from its differences, while at the same time, if the union is strong, no hill is too steep.  America tried nation building at home.  It called it McMansions and SUV’s.  The McMansions languish now in foreclosure courts, and the SUV’s sit parked by $4/gal gasoline; their manufacturers having been rescued by complete and utter abandonment of the rule of law.

In this effort, we draw inspiration from our fellow Americans who have sacrificed so much on our behalf.  To our troops, our veterans and their families, I speak for all Americans when I say that we will keep our sacred trust with you, and provide you with the care and benefits and opportunity that you deserve.  

The last refuge of a scoundrel…

I met some of these patriotic Americans at Fort Campbell.  A while back, I spoke to the 101st Airborne that has fought to turn the tide in Afghanistan, and to the team that took out Osama bin Laden.  Standing in front of a model of bin Laden’s compound, the Navy SEAL who led that effort paid tribute to those who had been lost –- brothers and sisters in arms whose names are now written on bases where our troops stand guard overseas, and on headstones in quiet corners of our country where their memory will never be forgotten.  This officer — like so many others I’ve met on bases, in Baghdad and Bagram, and at Walter Reed and Bethesda Naval Hospital -– spoke with humility about how his unit worked together as one, depending on each other, and trusting one another, as a family might do in a time of peril. 

It’s not the dying that is their greatest sacrifice.  We all are headed there.  Their greatest sacrifice is the killing that you ask them to do that robs them of their humanity.

That’s a lesson worth remembering -– that we are all a part of one American family.  Though we have known disagreement and division, we are bound together by the creed that is written into our founding documents, and a conviction that the United States of America is a country that can achieve whatever it sets out to accomplish.  Now, let us finish the work at hand.  Let us responsibly end these wars, and reclaim the American Dream that is at the center of our story.  With confidence in our cause, with faith in our fellow citizens, and with hope in our hearts, let us go about the work of extending the promise of America -– for this generation, and the next.

If America is a family, it is, like Tolstoy’s unhappy families, discordant in a thousand different ways.  But that’s just it, it is not a family.  It is nothing more or less than a capitalistic union, a collusive effort at getting rich, the quicker and easier the better.  It has no collective animating value except that having more is better than having less.   It is turning imperialistic because the law of diminishing returns is making domestic increases in wealth ever more difficult to come by.   It used the excuse of 9-11 to expand the Empire and borrow with reckless abandon in order that it might appear to be growing wealthier.  The collapse of 2008 was just a portent of what is to come, as private risks have been socialized to such an extent that America is teetering ever closer to failure itself, and will be pushed over the edge when the next economic calamity strikes.  Then, the Empire might finally leave Afghanistan and Pakistan, but only because it has to, not because it wants to.

 May God bless our troops.  And may God bless the United States of America.

And to which God does Obama refer?  The Judeo-Christian God, that isn’t one God but a separate God for Jews and three separate Gods for Christians?  The Muslim God that is sort of like Yahweh and Jesus, but not quite?  Maybe Buddha?  Will this God also bless those Americans that don’t believe in him, whomever or whatever he happens to be?  Why should the troops be singled out for blessing by this God?  Wouldn’t wise and humble earthly leadership be all the blessing they need?  If patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel, religiously-invoked patriotism is the first.